【唐文明】朱一包養網子《孝經刊誤》析論

The so-called “dissolution” means that the literature department should not be divided into chapters, because in Zhu Zi’s opinion, the literature department is actually short and often linked. “The first thing in the book is to discuss the filial piety of filial piety, and the middle part is to express the filial piety of Emperor Chen, the marquis, the ministers, the scholars, and the common people. The last part is to say, “Therefore, from the emperor to the common people, filial piety has never begun, and there is no such thing as the end of the day.’ The beginning and end are in line with each other, and the order is in line with each other, and the text is connected, and the connection is connected, and the same is the same time There is no doubt about words. Later generations have divided them into chapters 6 and 7, and added the texts of “Zi Yue” and “Book” to quotate the “Pen Shu” and “Book” to be confused, so that their meanings are separated, and readers will not be able to see the entire meaning of the holy words, which will cause the harm to be fine.”[5]

The following quotations have been discussedBaobao.comThe problem that was added was mentioned, namely, the two “Ziyue” in the literary department, the four “Penyue” and the one “Penyue” in Zhu Zi’s opinion were arbitrarily added by later generations. Adding the relationship with the analysis. There are four “Zi Yue” in the literary department. The first two are in the original first chapter (“The Chapter of Mingyi of the Original School”), and they clearly present the words that Confucius and Zengzi answered, so Zhu Zi thought there was no problem. The last two are in the original second chapter (“The Emperor’s Chapter”) and the Sixth chapter (“The Common People’s Chapter”). Zhu Zi believed that later generations made arbitrarily to divide chapters. [6] The fourth chapter of the essay department is quoted in the article, which is at the end of the chapters of Chapter 1, Chapter 3 (The Chapter of the Lord of the Lord), Chapter 4 (The Chapter of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord), and Chapter 5 (The Chapter of the Scholars). The first chapter of the book is quoted in the end of the chapters of Chapter 2. Zhu Zi believed that these were all arbitrarily made by later generations to divide chapters, so that the meaning of the article is separated. Therefore, Zhu Zi’s overall suggestion on the literary department was, “These six and seven chapters are combined into one chapter, and the two are mentioned in the “Zi Shu” and the four are quoted in the “Book” and the four are quoted in the “Book” and the old ones.” [7]

It can be seen that Zhu Zi’s criticism of the four parts of the literary department, citing the “Book” and the “Book” are important to note that these invocations have led to the analysis of the essay, and did not explicitly state whether these invocations can have any problems in theory. However, it is difficult for us to conclude from this that the additions mentioned by Zhu Xi are completely on the point of the analysis of the text and do not involve any meaning. At the end of the review original chapter eight (“Sancai Chapter”)When citing “Pen Song”, Zhu Zi once wrote a verse that “quoting “Pen Song” is not serious” and suggested to go; while when citing “Pen Song” in the original 9th ​​(“Falling in the Chapter 21 (“Staff of the Lord”), Zhu Zi had a verse that “quoting “Pen Song” was nothing”, “quoting “Pen Song” was enough to invent the meaning of moving filial piety to serve the Lord” and suggested to be preserved. So, can we justify this? Zhu Zi would also think that “no concern” about the quotation of “Poems” and “Books” by the essay department. Since he has clearly suggested that these invocations be taken? Although we are difficult to find evidence of a step further, this proposal may be valid from the point of view of Zhu Zi’s thoughts and strict discussion style. So the problem that needs to be considered is: what changes will be caused by preserving or taking the contents of citing “Poems” and “Books” in the literature department?

Let us first analyze the quotations of “Pen” and “Book” from the perspective of theoretical correlation. The “Zhao Zhiming Chapter” first clearly states that filial piety is the foundation of virtue, and then the “starts from affairs, serves the king, and establishes qualities” is used to describe the end of filial piety. At the end of the chapter, the words “no thoughts of one’s ancestors, cultivates one’s virtues” in “Pen, Da Ya, King Wen”, presenting the meaning between “respect for one’s ancestors” and “cultivating virtues”. The Emperor’s Chapter says that the emperor’s filial piety is what he said, “My virtue and education are added to the cause and punishment are everywhere.” The end of the chapter uses the words “A person has a good reputation and the common people are willing to pay attention to it” in “Shangshu·Jiu Punishment” and the meaning is consistent. “Zhu Hou Zhang” says that the filial piety of Zu Hou is about “not being more sensible” and “making up the straits”. The last chapter uses the words “Waring in a scrupulous battle is as deep as a purity, as walking on thin ice” in “Zhu Zhou Xiaoya Xiao Min”, which corresponds to the meaning. “The Chapter of Youth” says that “Your filial piety is said to be “You a